Pages

Tuesday, July 8, 2025

Philosophical Comparison of Five Political Thinkers


1. Basic Contexts and Backgrounds

ThinkerKey Work(s)Historical Context
Thomas HobbesLeviathan (1651)English Civil War; fear of anarchy; secular, scientific approach to politics
John LockeTwo Treatises of Government (1689)Glorious Revolution; early liberalism; pro-parliament
Jean-Jacques RousseauThe Social Contract (1762)Enlightenment, critique of inequality; pre-French Revolution
John MiltonAreopagitica (1644), Tenure of Kings and Magistrates (1649)English Civil War, Puritan ideology; radical Protestant republicanism
Niccolò MachiavelliThe Prince (1532), Discourses (1531)Italian city-state chaos; Renaissance humanism; realism in politics

2. View of Human Nature

ThinkerHuman Nature
HobbesSelfish, fearful, competitive—homo homini lupus (man is a wolf to man)
LockeRational, cooperative, guided by natural law
RousseauNaturally good, corrupted by social institutions
MiltonRational and moral, but fallen; guided by conscience and God
MachiavelliSelf-interested, fickle, deceptive; prone to evil when unrestrained

3. The Social Contract / Origin of Government

ThinkerSource and Purpose of Authority
HobbesIndividuals surrender all rights to a sovereign for security; absolute authority needed to prevent chaos
LockePeople form governments to protect natural rights; limited government with right to rebel
RousseauGovernment must embody the general will; authority arises from collective agreement
MiltonGovernment is a covenant between God and people; rulers must serve God and liberty
MachiavelliPower arises through force, cunning, or chance; political authority must be effective, not necessarily moral

4. Liberty and Individual Rights

ThinkerView of Liberty
HobbesLiberty is the absence of external impediments, but must be sacrificed for peace
LockeLiberty is living under known laws with consent
RousseauLiberty is obedience to the general will (collective freedom)
MiltonLiberty is moral and spiritual freedom—freedom of conscience and expression
MachiavelliLiberty is the independence of the state; individual liberty is secondary to political strength

5. Religion and Politics

ThinkerReligion's Role
HobbesReligion is subordinate to the sovereign; prevents religious conflict
LockeSupports religious tolerance; separation of church and state
RousseauReligion should support civic values (civil religion)
MiltonDeeply Christian; religious liberty is central
MachiavelliReligion is useful for maintaining order and virtue, not truth-based

6. Rebellion and Political Legitimacy

ThinkerView on Rebellion
HobbesRebellion is never justified; it returns society to the state of nature (chaos)
LockeJustified when government breaks the social contract or violates rights
RousseauLegitimate only when general will is suppressed or corrupted
MiltonJustified against tyrants who defy God and the people
MachiavelliRebellion is a political tool; effectiveness justifies action, not moral principles

Summary Table

FeatureHobbesLockeRousseauMiltonMachiavelli
Human NatureSelfish, fearfulRational, cooperativeGood, corruptedMoral, fallenSelfish, power-seeking
Purpose of Gov’tSecurity, peaceProtect rightsExpress general willServe liberty & GodMaintain order & power
Ideal GovernmentAbsolute sovereignLimited, constitutionalDirect democracyRepublic under GodStrong prince or republic
View of LibertySubmission to authorityLegal, individual libertyCollective self-ruleConscience, expressionState power and order
Rebellion?Never justifiedJustified if rights violatedIf will of people deniedJustified against tyrannyTactically useful
ReligionSubordinate to stateTolerated, separateCivil religion for unityCore to libertyTool for statecraft

No comments:

Post a Comment