Pages

Friday, May 30, 2025

Duct Tape to the Rescue - Apollo 13

How Ed Smylie and Duct Tape Helped Save Apollo 13

When the Apollo 13 mission launched on April 11, 1970, no one imagined it would become one of NASA’s most dramatic and heroic rescues. But just two days into the mission, an oxygen tank exploded aboard the spacecraft, crippling the command module and forcing three astronauts—Jim Lovell, Jack Swigert, and Fred Haise—into a life-or-death struggle for survival. In the chaos that followed, a quiet genius behind the scenes played a pivotal role in their return: Ed Smylie.

Who Was Ed Smylie?

Ed Smylie was an engineer at NASA, serving as the Director of Life Systems at the Johnson Space Center during Apollo 13. His job? Designing the life-support systems that kept astronauts alive in space—including air filtration, temperature control, and breathable atmosphere. But on April 13, 1970, that job suddenly included figuring out how to save three lives using only what was already on board a crippled spacecraft.

The CO₂ Crisis

After the explosion, the crew had to move into the Lunar Module (LM) "Aquarius," which was only designed to support two astronauts for two days—not three astronauts for four. One of the immediate problems was carbon dioxide buildup. The LM used different, square lithium hydroxide canisters to scrub CO₂ from the air, while the command module had round ones. Unfortunately, they weren’t compatible.

As CO₂ levels climbed to dangerous levels, ground control had to improvise—and fast.

Enter Duct Tape

Ed Smylie and his team were tasked with designing an adapter that would allow the square filters to work with the round holes in the LM’s system. Their materials? Only what the astronauts had on board: plastic bags, cardboard, a space suit hose, and—most famously—duct tape.

Smylie and his team worked under intense pressure, rapidly prototyping a solution and testing it on Earth. They then relayed instructions to the crew on how to assemble what became known as the “mailbox.” The astronauts followed the step-by-step directions, built the device, and successfully lowered CO₂ levels.

It was a triumph of ingenuity, teamwork, and calm under pressure.

Why It Matters

The Apollo 13 mission is often summed up with the phrase, “Failure is not an option.” But that sentiment was more than just a tagline—it was the mindset that defined Ed Smylie’s career. His ability to think creatively under extreme conditions, and his understanding of practical engineering, directly contributed to the survival of the crew.

Duct tape may have become the poster child of this story, but it was Smylie's resourcefulness, quick thinking, and ability to work the problem that made the difference.

Legacy

Today, Ed Smylie is remembered as one of NASA’s unsung heroes. His work on Apollo 13 has become a case study in innovation under constraint, inspiring engineers and problem-solvers around the world.

And thanks to him, duct tape’s reputation as a miracle tool has never been stronger.


Closing Thought
The Apollo 13 rescue reminds us that true brilliance often happens behind the scenes—where calm minds, creative thinking, and everyday materials can save lives. In a world where high-tech solutions often steal the spotlight, Ed Smylie showed us that sometimes, the best tool for the job is duct tape—and the right person holding it.

Saturday, May 24, 2025

In Flanders Fields

 In Flanders Fields


In Flanders fields the poppies blow
Between the crosses, row on row,
    That mark our place; and in the sky
    The larks, still bravely singing, fly
Scarce heard amid the guns below.

We are the Dead. Short days ago
We lived, felt dawn, saw sunset glow,
    Loved and were loved, and now we lie,
        In Flanders fields.

Take up our quarrel with the foe:
To you from failing hands we throw
    The torch; be yours to hold it high.
    If ye break faith with us who die
We shall not sleep, though poppies grow
        In Flanders fields.

Wednesday, May 14, 2025

Exegesis of 2 Peter 3:9

 

Text:

“The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness. Instead, he is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance.” (2 Peter 3:9, NIV)

Context and Meaning

Peter addresses believers anxious about the apparent delay in Christ’s return. He assures them that the delay is not due to God’s inability or indifference, but rather His patience-giving more people the opportunity to repent and be saved. The verse emphasizes God’s character: He is both sovereign and merciful, desiring the salvation of all.

The Paradox: God’s Sovereignty vs. “Not Willing That Any Should Perish”

God’s Sovereignty

Scripture consistently affirms that God is sovereign-He ordains, foreknows, and elects those who will be saved (Romans 8:29-30; Ephesians 1:4-5.) Salvation is ultimately the work of God’s will and grace, not human effort alone.

God’s Desire for All to Be Saved

2 Peter 3:9 expresses God’s desire that “none should perish but all should come to repentance.” This is echoed elsewhere (1 Timothy 2:4), highlighting God’s loving character and universal salvific will.

Reconciling the Paradox

AspectGod’s SovereigntyGod’s Will That None Perish
Scriptural BasisGod elects, predestines, and calls (Eph 1:4-5)God desires all to repent (2 Pet 3:9)
Human RoleSalvation is by God’s initiative and graceHumans are called to respond and repent
TensionNot all are saved, despite God’s desireGod’s will is not always fulfilled in this
ResolutionBoth truths held together in biblical tensionMystery remains; both are affirmed

Key Insights:

  • Not a Contradiction, but a Mystery:
    The Bible presents both divine sovereignty and human responsibility side-by-side, without resolving the tension. God is fully sovereign, yet holds people responsible for their response to the gospel.

  • God’s Sovereignty Ordains the Means and the Ends:
    God not only ordains who will be saved, but also the means-such as preaching, repentance, and faith-by which people are saved. Human response is real and significant, yet always under God’s sovereign plan.

  • God’s “Will” in 2 Peter 3:9:
    The word “will” (Greek: boulomai) here can refer to God’s desire or disposition, not necessarily His sovereign decree. While God desires all to repent, He allows human freedom and does not coerce repentance. Thus, His “will” in this context expresses His compassionate longing, not an absolute decree that overrides human will.

  • Patience, Not Powerlessness:
    The delay in judgment is not a sign of God’s weakness, but of His patience, giving people time to repent. This patience is an expression of both His sovereignty and His mercy.

Theological Implications

  • Encouragement to Evangelize:
    Since God desires all to repent, believers are urged to proclaim the gospel widely, trusting God with the results.

  • Humility Before Mystery:
    The interplay between God’s sovereign election and His universal salvific will is ultimately a mystery. Christians are called to affirm both, without diminishing either.

“We know one truth and we know another truth and we understand that these truths coexist, even though they are somewhat mysterious to us. We don’t fully understand how these two truths work together in each and every way, but recognizing a mysterious aspect does not necessarily mean it is a contradiction.”

Conclusion

2 Peter 3:9 affirms both God’s sovereign rule and His compassionate desire for all to be saved. The apparent paradox is not a contradiction, but a profound mystery at the heart of biblical teaching: God is sovereign in salvation, yet He genuinely desires all to come to repentance. Both truths should lead to awe at God’s greatness and a serious response to His call to repentance and faith.